Hit frequency versus prize size at Rainbet

Return figures describe long samples, not the next ten spins. Hit frequency counts how often any winning combination appears. It does not count how large those wins are. A Rainbet pokie can ping the balance often and still drain it if most hits are smaller than the stake.

On the Rainbet homepage the useful object is still a title with an info screen, not a trailer that never names a generator or a return in the build that is actually running as the info screen publishes it as the info screen publishes it as the info screen publishes it as the info screen publishes it. RTP folds size and rate into one long-run ratio. Hit frequency isolates rate. Used together they explain a game: frequent crumbs, or rare chunks. The info screen at Rainbet may not print hit frequency in plain language, but the feel of the base game usually reveals it within a short sample.

Chasing a high hit rate as if it were a higher return is a category error. The useful question is whether the hits are large enough to matter. Technical notes that separate those two metrics are gathered on Rainbet online for anyone comparing titles inside Rainbet.

Feature-trigger rate is a cousin of hit frequency, not a synonym. A game can award small line wins often and still almost never open the bonus. Read both rhythms before you treat a Rainbet title as generous. The catalogue gets easier when those terms stay unmerged. Weights, not artwork size, decide how often a symbol is drawn. Return figures describe long samples, not the next ten spins Keep that distinction when the lobby tile gets loud. Published returns do not follow a personal ledger, so the session cap is a bankroll tool rather than a theory about debt. Published returns do not follow a personal ledger, so familiar art is never treated as a substitute for rules.